EMF, G6, and G7

Current evidence does not show that cell-tower or mobile-network electromagnetic fields damage the brain. G6 and G7 are not yet commercial technologies. Future networks are expected to use non-ionizing radiation, which does not have enough energy to break DNA or brain-cell bonds.

Here is how these fields interact with the brain:

The Physics: Why It Doesn’t Damage Brains
• Non-ionizing energy: Cell towers use low-energy radio waves. Unlike X-rays or ultraviolet light, these waves cannot break chemical bonds, remove electrons, or change DNA.
• Limited penetration: At mobile-network frequencies, the main effect in tissue is slight heating. The World Health Organisation (WHO) and International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) say this heating is negligible in organs such as the brain.
• Distance drop-off: Exposure falls quickly as distance from the source increases. A nearby cell tower is typically far below safety limits and often weaker than the device held in your hand. [1]

Current vs. Future Generations (5G to G6/G7)
• 3G/4G: 700 MHz–2.7 GHz. These networks have been used worldwide for decades. Large studies of hundreds of thousands of users have not found a statistical rise in brain cancer.
• 5G: 24–47 GHz and some lower bands. Higher frequencies can carry more data but do not travel as deeply through tissue. They are mostly absorbed by the outer skin layers.
• 6G/7G: Expected sub-THz or THz ranges. Standards are still being researched. Higher frequencies should have shorter ranges and very little penetration, while operating within safety guidelines.

Independent Research and Global Consensus
Large studies listed by the European Commission and PubMed data have not found a verified link between normal cell-tower exposure and cognitive decline or glioma. Some laboratory studies report brief, small EEG changes when a powerful phone is next to the head, but these changes have not been linked to harmful health effects.